At The Existentialist Café
Freedom, Being and Apricot Cocktails
Book Edition Details
Summary
Apricot cocktails and the Left Bank of Paris—an unlikely birthplace for a philosophical revolution. In 1933, Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir encounter the magnetic pull of Phenomenology, thanks to the charismatic Raymond Aron. This serendipitous meeting sows the seeds for Existentialism, a movement that would rip through jazz clubs and intellectual circles alike, challenging notions of freedom, authenticity, and activism. "At the Existentialist Café" unfurls the intoxicating tales of philosophers, artists, and rebels as they navigate the tumult of the 20th century, weaving passion with philosophy. In a world grappling with modern dilemmas of identity and responsibility, this book invites readers to relive the fervor and insight of those who dared to ask: What does it mean to truly be free?
Introduction
In the smoky cafés of 1930s Paris, three young philosophers sat drinking apricot cocktails, unaware they were about to ignite one of the most influential intellectual movements of the modern era. Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, and their circle would transform abstract German phenomenology into a vibrant philosophy of freedom that spoke directly to the human condition. Their existentialism emerged from the crucible of two world wars, Nazi occupation, and the collapse of traditional certainties, offering a radical vision: we are condemned to be free, and in that freedom lies both our terror and our hope. These thinkers lived their philosophy as intensely as they wrote it. Sartre, the brilliant but physically unprepossessing writer who captivated audiences with his vision of radical freedom. Beauvoir, the pioneering feminist who refused conventional marriage while maintaining a lifelong intellectual partnership with Sartre. Together with Albert Camus, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and the enigmatic Martin Heidegger, they created a philosophy that was simultaneously deeply personal and politically engaged. From their encounters, readers will discover how philosophical ideas emerge from lived experience, how intellectual courage can challenge oppressive systems, and how the fundamental questions of human existence—freedom, responsibility, authenticity—remain as urgent today as they were in the shadow of fascism. Their story reveals philosophy not as abstract theorizing but as a passionate engagement with the most pressing questions of how to live.
Philosophical Awakening: From Phenomenology to Existence
The intellectual revolution that became existentialism began not with grand theories but with a simple observation about cocktails. When Raymond Aron told his friend Jean-Paul Sartre that phenomenology could make philosophy out of an apricot cocktail, he was introducing a radical new approach to thinking about human experience. This German method, developed by Edmund Husserl, demanded that philosophers abandon abstract speculation and return "to the things themselves"—to describe experience exactly as it presents itself, without the overlay of scientific theories or philosophical assumptions. Husserl's phenomenology emerged from his conviction that consciousness is always consciousness of something, always reaching out toward objects in the world. This "intentionality" meant that the mind was not a private container of thoughts but a dynamic relationship with reality. For Husserl, careful description of these relationships could reveal the fundamental structures of human experience. His method required a kind of intellectual cleansing, setting aside preconceptions to encounter phenomena in their pure immediacy. But it was Martin Heidegger who transformed phenomenology into something more radical. In his masterwork "Being and Time," Heidegger argued that philosophers had forgotten the most basic question of all: what does it mean for anything to be? Human existence, or "Dasein," was not just another object to be studied but the unique kind of being that questions its own being. We exist not as isolated subjects contemplating objects but as beings always already thrown into a world of tools, projects, and relationships with others. Heidegger's vision of human existence was both exhilarating and disturbing. We are not defined by any fixed essence or nature but must constantly create ourselves through our choices and actions. This freedom brings anxiety, for we can never be certain we are choosing correctly. Yet in facing this anxiety authentically, rather than fleeing into the comfortable conformity of "the they," we can achieve genuine selfhood. This philosophical foundation would prove explosive when transplanted to the very different soil of French intellectual life.
War and Resistance: Philosophy Under Fire
The Nazi occupation of France transformed existentialism from abstract philosophy into urgent lived reality. Sartre, captured as a prisoner of war, spent his captivity reading Heidegger's "Being and Time" and discovering in it a philosophy perfectly suited to a nation in defeat. The German thinker's emphasis on thrownness, anxiety, and the need for authentic choice spoke directly to the French experience of humiliation and moral confusion. In the prison camp, Sartre began developing his own philosophical response, the massive work that would become "Being and Nothingness." Meanwhile, Simone de Beauvoir navigated occupied Paris, teaching in schools that required her to sign declarations that she was neither Jewish nor a Freemason, scraping maggots off black-market meat, and reading Hegel in heated libraries while waiting for news of Sartre. The occupation forced ordinary people into extraordinary moral situations, where every choice carried weight and consequences. Should one collaborate to survive? Resist and endanger others? The comfortable bourgeois assumption that one could remain neutral in political matters had been shattered forever. Albert Camus, working as a journalist and editor of the resistance newspaper Combat, developed his own response to the apparent meaninglessness of existence. His novel "The Stranger" and essay "The Myth of Sisyphus" explored what he called the "absurd"—the collision between human need for meaning and the universe's indifferent silence. Yet Camus rejected despair, arguing instead for a kind of heroic acceptance: we must imagine Sisyphus happy as he rolls his boulder up the mountain for eternity, finding meaning in the struggle itself rather than in any ultimate purpose. The war years revealed both the power and the limitations of existentialist thinking. While Sartre and Beauvoir formed resistance groups and wrote manifestos, their actual impact on the war effort was minimal. But their philosophical work during this period—exploring freedom, responsibility, and authentic action under extreme circumstances—would prove to have far greater historical significance than any acts of sabotage. They were developing a new understanding of human freedom that would inspire liberation movements for decades to come.
Liberation and Global Impact: Ideas in Action
The liberation of Paris in August 1944 unleashed an explosion of existentialist creativity and influence. Sartre's 1945 lecture "Existentialism is a Humanism" drew such crowds that chairs were broken and people fainted in the crush. His central message was both simple and revolutionary: existence precedes essence, meaning that humans have no predetermined nature but must create themselves through their choices. We are "condemned to be free," bearing full responsibility for what we make of ourselves and our world. This philosophy of radical freedom found perfect expression in the Saint-Germain-des-Prés café culture that emerged after the war. Sartre and Beauvoir held court at the Café de Flore, surrounded by writers, artists, and jazz musicians, all united by a rejection of bourgeois respectability and conventional morality. The existentialist lifestyle—with its emphasis on authenticity, sexual freedom, and political engagement—became as influential as existentialist philosophy. Young people across Europe and America adopted the black turtlenecks, jazz music, and late-night philosophical discussions that seemed to embody existentialist values. Beauvoir's contribution to this movement was particularly significant. Her novel "She Came to Stay" explored the complex dynamics of a three-way relationship, while her philosophical essay "The Ethics of Ambiguity" developed existentialist ethics more systematically than Sartre ever managed. Most importantly, her groundbreaking work "The Second Sex" applied existentialist insights to women's situation, arguing that women had been defined as the "Other" throughout history and must claim their freedom to define themselves. This work would become one of the founding texts of modern feminism. The existentialists' influence extended far beyond philosophy and literature. Their journal "Les Temps Modernes" became a forum for political engagement, supporting decolonization movements and criticizing both American capitalism and Soviet communism. They embodied the ideal of the "engaged intellectual," using their fame and influence to intervene in political debates. Yet this very success would eventually create tensions within the movement, as the demands of political commitment sometimes conflicted with the individualistic emphasis of existentialist philosophy.
Legacy and Transformation: The Enduring Human Question
By the 1950s, existentialism had become a global phenomenon, but success brought new challenges and contradictions. Sartre's growing commitment to Marxism created tension with his earlier emphasis on individual freedom, while his support for Stalin's Soviet Union troubled many former admirers. The friendship between Sartre and Camus fractured over political differences, particularly regarding the use of violence in revolutionary movements. Camus maintained his opposition to capital punishment and political killing, while Sartre argued for a more pragmatic approach to revolutionary necessity. The movement also faced intellectual challenges as new philosophical trends emerged. Structuralists like Claude Lévi-Strauss dismissed existentialism as "shop-girl metaphysics," arguing that human behavior was determined by unconscious structures rather than conscious choices. The rise of postmodernism further undermined existentialist assumptions about authentic selfhood and meaningful action. By the 1960s, existentialism seemed to many intellectuals like a relic of an earlier, more naive era. Yet existentialism's influence proved more durable than its critics expected. The civil rights movement, student protests of 1968, and various liberation movements drew inspiration from existentialist themes of freedom, authenticity, and resistance to oppression. Martin Luther King Jr. read Sartre and Heidegger while developing his philosophy of nonviolent resistance. The feminist movement built on Beauvoir's insights about women's situation and the need to claim one's freedom from social definitions. Perhaps most importantly, existentialism established a new model for how philosophy could engage with lived experience. Rather than retreating into academic abstraction, the existentialists showed how philosophical thinking could illuminate the concrete challenges of human existence—anxiety, freedom, responsibility, relationships, death. Their example inspired later thinkers to bridge the gap between philosophical reflection and practical wisdom, ensuring that philosophy remained relevant to people grappling with the fundamental questions of how to live. In our current era of technological disruption and political upheaval, their insights into freedom, authenticity, and responsibility remain as relevant as ever.
Summary
The existentialists' greatest legacy lies not in any particular doctrine but in their demonstration that philosophy can be a passionate engagement with the deepest questions of human existence. They showed that intellectual courage—the willingness to question everything, to face uncomfortable truths about freedom and responsibility, to live authentically rather than conventionally—remains one of our most powerful tools for navigating an uncertain world. From their example, we can learn the importance of taking responsibility for our choices rather than blaming circumstances or seeking easy answers from authority figures. Their emphasis on "situated freedom"—the recognition that we are always free within particular contexts and constraints—offers a more nuanced understanding of human agency than either pure determinism or naive libertarianism. Their commitment to political engagement reminds us that philosophical reflection divorced from practical action risks becoming mere intellectual game-playing. Their story will particularly resonate with anyone struggling to balance personal authenticity with social responsibility, individual freedom with commitment to others, or intellectual honesty with political effectiveness. In an age when traditional authorities and certainties continue to crumble, the existentialists' example of creating meaning through conscious choice and authentic action offers both inspiration and practical guidance for navigating the complexities of modern life.
Related Books
Download PDF & EPUB
To save this Black List summary for later, download the free PDF and EPUB. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
By Sarah Bakewell
