Success and Luck
Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy
Book Edition Details
Summary
When the dice of destiny roll, who truly emerges victorious? In "Success and Luck," Robert Frank challenges the entrenched belief that wealth and achievement are solely the fruit of talent and hard work. With a captivating blend of economic insight and social critique, Frank unveils how sheer happenstance shapes our lives far more than acknowledged. As the rich bask in their fortunes, they often overlook the silent partner in their success—luck. This oversight breeds inequality, perpetuating myths that damage both personal ambitions and public policy. Yet, Frank offers a hopeful twist: a few modest changes could unleash a wave of prosperity and fairness, creating a world where luck's shadow no longer looms so large.
Introduction
Contemporary Western culture celebrates individual achievement with an almost religious fervor, yet this celebration rests on a fundamental misunderstanding of how success actually operates in modern society. The prevailing narrative suggests that talent and hard work inevitably lead to prosperity, while failure reflects personal shortcomings. This perspective, while psychologically comforting and motivationally useful, obscures a more complex reality where chance events play a far more decisive role than most people recognize or acknowledge. The systematic underestimation of luck's importance has profound consequences extending beyond individual psychology into the realm of public policy and social structure. When successful individuals attribute their achievements solely to personal merit, they become less willing to support the public investments that created the very environments enabling their success. This creates a dangerous feedback loop: reduced investment in infrastructure, education, and social institutions diminishes the opportunities available to future generations, while increasing inequality amplifies the role of chance in determining life outcomes. The analysis presented here employs rigorous economic reasoning, psychological research, and mathematical modeling to demonstrate not only that luck matters more than commonly believed, but that acknowledging this reality could unlock unprecedented opportunities for collective prosperity. Rather than diminishing the importance of effort and talent, understanding luck's role reveals how societies can create conditions where these qualities are more likely to flourish for everyone.
The Pervasive Yet Underestimated Role of Chance in Success
Random events shape life trajectories in ways both dramatic and subtle, yet cognitive biases systematically blind us to their influence. The availability heuristic leads people to recall vivid instances of their own effort and skill while overlooking countless fortunate circumstances that enabled those qualities to bear fruit. The asymmetry between headwinds and tailwinds in human memory means obstacles faced loom large in consciousness while favorable conditions fade into background assumptions about normalcy. Consider the mathematics of competitive markets. When thousands of highly talented, hardworking individuals compete for limited positions, small random variations can determine outcomes. A software programmer might encounter a mentor at precisely the right moment, or an entrepreneur might pitch to investors who happened to have relevant industry experience. These seemingly minor coincidences often prove decisive in highly competitive environments where margins between success and failure are razor-thin. The geographical lottery represents perhaps the most consequential form of luck. Being born in a developed nation with strong institutions, quality education systems, and economic opportunities provides advantages that dwarf individual variations in talent or work ethic. The economist Branko Milanovic has shown that roughly half of global income variation stems from just two factors: country of residence and position within that country's income distribution. This suggests that circumstances beyond personal control determine life prospects to an extraordinary degree. Even personal characteristics typically attributed to individual merit often reflect fortunate genetic and environmental inheritance. Intelligence, emotional stability, physical health, and the psychological capacity for sustained effort all emerge from complex interactions between genes and early experiences over which individuals exercise no control. Recognizing this does not diminish personal responsibility or effort, but rather highlights how multiple forms of good fortune must align for exceptional achievement to occur.
Winner-Take-All Markets and the Amplification of Luck's Impact
Technological advances and globalization have created unprecedented winner-take-all dynamics across numerous industries, dramatically amplifying the consequences of small performance differences and random events. When the best performers can serve global markets at near-zero marginal cost, minor advantages in timing, connections, or initial conditions can translate into enormous disparities in outcomes. The entertainment industry exemplifies these dynamics. Digital distribution enables the most popular songs, films, and books to reach worldwide audiences, but initial success often depends on arbitrary factors like early reviewer preferences or algorithm recommendations. The Music Lab experiments demonstrate how identical content can achieve wildly different levels of popularity based solely on random variations in early user responses, which then cascade through social feedback mechanisms. Corporate leadership markets exhibit similar patterns. As companies have grown larger and more complex, CEO decisions affect increasingly vast resources, justifying enormous compensation packages for perceived marginal improvements in leadership quality. However, the process of identifying superior leaders remains highly imperfect, with chance playing significant roles in career trajectories that ultimately determine who reaches top positions. Factors like organizational politics, economic cycles, and industry trends often matter as much as genuine leadership ability. Network effects further amplify randomness in winner-take-all markets. Products or services that gain early adoption advantages can lock in dominant positions regardless of objective quality differences. Microsoft's dominance in operating systems resulted partly from fortunate timing and IBM's strategic miscalculations, while superior alternatives like Betamax lost to VHS despite technical advantages. These dynamics create path-dependent outcomes where small random events early in market development determine long-term winners and losers. The concentration of rewards in winner-take-all markets means that increasing numbers of highly qualified individuals compete for shrinking numbers of top positions. In such environments, luck becomes increasingly important because winning requires that nearly everything goes right. Even when chance accounts for only a small percentage of performance, the winner of a large competition will almost inevitably be among the luckiest contestants as well as among the most skilled.
False Beliefs About Merit and Their Societal Consequences
Despite overwhelming evidence for luck's importance, individuals and societies maintain powerful psychological and cultural commitments to merit-based explanations of success. These false beliefs persist because they serve important functions: they motivate effort by suggesting controllable paths to achievement, they help successful people maintain self-esteem and social status, and they provide simple narratives for complex phenomena. The psychological tendency toward self-serving attribution means people readily accept personal responsibility for positive outcomes while attributing failures to external circumstances. Successful individuals remember their hard work and strategic decisions vividly, while the favorable conditions enabling those efforts to succeed fade into assumed background normalcy. This creates genuine conviction among high achievers that their success reflects purely personal merit. Beliefs about individual merit also serve motivational functions that may be psychologically adaptive even when factually incorrect. Students who believe success depends entirely on effort may persist through difficulties that would discourage those who recognize luck's role. Entrepreneurs who ignore statistical failure rates may be more willing to take necessary risks. However, these benefits come with significant costs when false beliefs about merit influence social policy. The most damaging consequence of merit mythology lies in its effects on public investment and social solidarity. When successful individuals believe their achievements result purely from personal virtue, they become less willing to support public goods that benefit society broadly. This creates a vicious cycle: reduced investment in education, infrastructure, and social institutions diminishes opportunities for future generations, while growing inequality makes luck even more decisive in determining life outcomes. Laboratory experiments confirm that people who believe their success stems from skill alone show less willingness to share resources with others or support redistributive policies. Conversely, those who acknowledge luck's role in their achievements demonstrate greater generosity and support for public goods. These findings suggest that more realistic beliefs about success could enhance social cooperation and collective welfare.
Policy Solutions: The Progressive Consumption Tax Framework
Recognizing luck's decisive role in contemporary success opens pathways to policy reforms that could dramatically improve outcomes for all income levels without requiring painful sacrifices from anyone. The key insight is that much current high-end consumption represents wasteful positional competition, where individual spending creates costs for others without generating proportional social benefits. When wealthy individuals build larger mansions or stage more elaborate celebrations, they shift frames of reference that influence what others feel compelled to spend to achieve social adequacy. This creates expenditure cascades that force middle-class families to stretch financially for housing in decent school districts or appropriately impressive lifecycle celebrations. These spending arms races generate enormous waste while creating financial pressure throughout the income distribution. A progressive consumption tax could address these problems by making high-end positional spending more expensive while encouraging saving and investment. Unlike income taxes that discourage productive activities, consumption taxes specifically target the wasteful competitive spending that creates negative externalities. The tax would be calculated as income minus savings minus a large exemption, with rates rising progressively for higher consumption levels. Such a system would simultaneously reduce wasteful spending competition and generate revenue for essential public investments. When all wealthy individuals face similar incentives to moderate consumption, relative positions remain unchanged while resources shift toward more productive uses. Rather than buying successively larger diamonds, cars, or houses, the wealthy would find smaller versions equally satisfying once social norms adjusted, while freed resources could fund infrastructure, education, and research. The progressive consumption tax enjoys unusual bipartisan appeal because it advances both conservative and liberal goals. Conservatives appreciate its encouragement of saving and investment, its efficiency advantages over income taxation, and its respect for individual choice. Liberals support its progressive distributive effects and its potential to fund public goods. This convergence suggests realistic possibilities for implementation when fiscal pressures eventually force serious tax reform discussions.
Summary
The evidence reveals a profound disconnect between popular beliefs about success and the reality of how achievement actually occurs in modern competitive societies. While talent and effort remain necessary for exceptional accomplishment, chance events and favorable circumstances play far more decisive roles than individuals or societies typically acknowledge. This misunderstanding has created a dangerous dynamic where successful people underinvest in the public goods that enabled their achievements, gradually eroding the foundations of shared prosperity. However, this same misunderstanding also creates unprecedented opportunities: because so much current spending represents wasteful positional competition, relatively simple policy changes could redirect enormous resources toward productive investments that benefit everyone, including the wealthy who would pay higher taxes. The ultimate irony is that societies could dramatically improve outcomes for all citizens, including the most successful, simply by acknowledging what careful analysis reveals to be true: that we are all, in large measure, fortunate beneficiaries of circumstances beyond our control.
Related Books
Download PDF & EPUB
To save this Black List summary for later, download the free PDF and EPUB. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
By Robert H. Frank
