The Future of Capitalism
Facing the New Anxieties
Book Edition Details
Summary
A fractured world stands at a crossroads in Paul Collier's incisive critique of capitalism's unraveling, "The Future of Capitalism." As societal seams stretch between bustling metropolises and forgotten hinterlands, between the privileged elite and the struggling many, Collier charts a daring course towards unity. His narrative weaves personal journeys and scholarly insights, challenging both populist clamor and socialist nostalgia. With pragmatic clarity, he proposes a revolutionary blend of ethical capitalism—a system rejuvenated by communitarian values and innovative policies. Collier's vision is a powerful call to mend the rifts of our times, offering a path to a future where capitalism works for all.
Introduction
In the aftermath of World War II, Western societies achieved something remarkable: they transformed capitalism from a system that had produced mass unemployment and social upheaval into one that delivered unprecedented prosperity and security for ordinary families. The steel mills of Sheffield hummed with activity, American suburbs flourished, and across Europe and North America, people could reasonably expect their children to live better lives than their own. This was capitalism working as it should, guided by ethical principles and shared social purpose. Yet today, we face a very different reality. The same economic system that once lifted millions into the middle class now seems to be pulling society apart. Cities like Detroit have become symbols of industrial decay while London and New York surge ahead as gleaming metropolises. Families that once provided stability across generations now fracture under economic pressure, leaving children adrift. Meanwhile, global wealth concentrates in fewer hands while entire regions feel abandoned. This transformation didn't happen overnight, nor was it inevitable. It resulted from specific choices about how to organize our economies, govern our societies, and structure our relationships with one another. Understanding this history reveals not just how we arrived at our current predicament, but more importantly, how we might chart a different course. This story speaks to anyone who senses that our current path is unsustainable and wonders whether capitalism can once again serve the common good.
The Golden Age: Social Democracy's Rise (1945-1970)
The quarter-century following World War II witnessed perhaps the most successful marriage of capitalism and social solidarity in human history. This golden age emerged from the ashes of economic catastrophe and global conflict, shaped by leaders who understood that markets needed moral purpose to function properly. The devastation of the 1930s Depression and the shared sacrifice of wartime had created something unprecedented: a genuine sense of national community that transcended class divisions. Social democratic parties across the Western world seized this moment to construct what they called the welfare state, though it was really something more profound. They built systems of mutual insurance where everyone contributed according to their ability and received according to their need. The British created their National Health Service with the principle that healthcare should be free at the point of use. Americans embraced Social Security and the GI Bill. Europeans constructed comprehensive unemployment insurance and public pension systems. These weren't just government programs; they were expressions of a shared commitment that everyone deserved security and opportunity. The genius of this system lay in its combination of market dynamism with social solidarity. Capitalism's creative destruction continued to drive innovation and efficiency, but its harsh edges were cushioned by collective action. When industries declined, workers could retrain. When breadwinners fell ill, families didn't face destitution. When children showed promise, society invested in their education regardless of their parents' circumstances. This created a virtuous cycle where economic growth and social cohesion reinforced each other. Perhaps most remarkably, this arrangement commanded broad political consensus. Conservative and Labour politicians in Britain, Republicans and Democrats in America, Christian Democrats and Social Democrats across Europe all accepted the basic framework. They might disagree on details, but they shared an understanding that capitalism worked best when it served recognizable social purposes and when its benefits reached everyone. This consensus rested on something deeper than policy agreements: a genuine sense of shared identity and mutual obligation that made ambitious collective action possible.
The Great Unraveling: From Community to Division (1980-2016)
By the 1980s, the social democratic consensus began to fracture under pressure from multiple directions. The stagflation of the 1970s had undermined confidence in government economic management, while new intellectual currents challenged the philosophical foundations of the welfare state. But the deeper problem was that the social solidarity forged during World War II was proving to be a wasting asset, gradually eroding as new generations came of age without shared experiences of national purpose. The rise of the knowledge economy created new forms of inequality that existing institutions couldn't easily address. As economies became more complex and specialized, education became increasingly important, but it also became a source of division. Those with degrees found themselves in a global marketplace for talent, connecting more easily with educated peers in other countries than with less-educated neighbors in their own communities. Meanwhile, traditional manufacturing jobs that had provided dignity and decent wages to high school graduates began disappearing, either automated away or relocated to countries with cheaper labor. These economic changes interacted with cultural shifts in destructive ways. The educated elite, increasingly detached from the communities where they grew up, embraced cosmopolitan values that emphasized individual self-fulfillment over traditional obligations to family and place. They developed what might be called a "geography of contempt," viewing those who remained in declining industrial towns as backward and bigoted. This cultural distance made it easier to ignore the mounting problems of deindustrialization and social breakdown in these forgotten places. Meanwhile, the intellectual foundations of social democracy were being hollowed out from within. The pragmatic spirit that had built the post-war settlement gave way to rigid ideological thinking. Technocrats armed with economic theory believed they could fine-tune society through expert administration. Lawyers expanded individual rights while neglecting corresponding responsibilities. Both groups lost touch with the moral intuitions and lived experiences of ordinary citizens, creating a dangerous gap between elite opinion and popular sentiment that would eventually explode into political rebellion.
The New Anxieties: Geographic, Class and Global Divides
Three great divides now split Western societies along lines that threaten the foundations of democratic capitalism. The geographic divide separates thriving metropolitan centers from struggling provincial cities and rural areas. The class divide separates the highly educated professional class from working people whose skills have lost value in the modern economy. The global divide separates rich countries from poor ones in ways that create massive migration pressures and undermine the social solidarity that successful societies require. These divisions reinforce each other in vicious cycles. Talented young people migrate from declining regions to booming cities, leaving behind communities with fewer resources to adapt to economic change. Educated professionals cluster together in expensive urban neighborhoods, their children attending elite schools while forming social networks that exclude those without similar credentials. Meanwhile, globalization allows both capital and skilled workers to move freely across borders while leaving less mobile populations to bear the costs of economic disruption. The geographic divide is perhaps most visible in the contrast between places like London and Sheffield, or Manhattan and Detroit. Metropolitan areas capture most of the gains from the knowledge economy because they offer the dense networks of specialized talent that modern businesses require. But these "agglomeration effects" create enormous economic rents that accrue mainly to property owners and highly skilled workers, while everyone else faces higher living costs without corresponding wage increases. Provincial cities that once thrived as industrial centers find themselves trapped in low-productivity activities, unable to compete for the high-value industries that generate good jobs. The class divide cuts even deeper, separating families that successfully navigate the modern economy from those that don't. Professional families invest enormous resources in their children's education and development, creating what sociologists call "concerted cultivation." Working-class families, lacking both resources and knowledge about how to game the system, watch their children fall further behind despite their best efforts. These different family strategies interact with economic changes to create what researchers call "diverging destinies," where initial advantages and disadvantages compound over generations rather than evening out over time.
Restoring Ethics: Pragmatic Solutions for Inclusive Capitalism
The path forward requires neither a return to an imagined past nor a leap into utopian futures, but rather a pragmatic reconstruction of the ethical foundations that once made capitalism work for everyone. This means rebuilding the institutions and cultural norms that can channel market forces toward socially beneficial ends while preserving the innovation and dynamism that make prosperity possible. The key insight is that capitalism works best when it operates within a framework of mutual obligations and shared purpose, not when it's left to operate according to pure self-interest. Addressing the geographic divide requires capturing some of the enormous economic rents generated in successful metropolitan areas and using them to rebuild opportunities in struggling regions. This means reforming taxation to ensure that those who benefit most from agglomeration effects contribute fairly to collective welfare, while simultaneously investing in the infrastructure, skills, and coordination necessary to create new centers of economic dynamism. The goal isn't to punish success but to ensure that prosperity spreads more broadly across national territory. Healing the class divide demands a more comprehensive approach that begins with strengthening families and communities under stress. Instead of waiting for problems to emerge and then intervening punitively, society needs to provide intensive support to young families facing difficult circumstances. This means quality early childhood programs, community-based mentoring, and economic policies that make it possible for parents to provide stable homes for their children. It also means creating pathways to dignity and decent wages for people without elite educational credentials. Perhaps most importantly, restoring ethical capitalism requires rebuilding the sense of shared identity and mutual obligation that makes ambitious collective action possible. This doesn't mean returning to the nationalism of the past, with its exclusions and hatreds, but rather developing what might be called "inclusive patriotism" based on shared commitment to place and common purpose. When people feel genuinely connected to each other and to their communities, they're willing to make the investments and sacrifices that prosperity and security require.
Summary
The fundamental tension running through this story is between capitalism's extraordinary capacity to generate wealth and innovation and its tendency to create divisions that undermine the social solidarity on which it ultimately depends. The golden age of the post-war decades showed that this tension can be resolved when societies develop strong enough bonds of mutual obligation to channel market forces toward inclusive ends. The breakdown of that settlement since the 1980s demonstrates what happens when those bonds erode and market logic operates without ethical constraints. Today's crises aren't inevitable features of modern capitalism but rather the predictable results of specific choices about how to organize our economies and societies. The good news is that different choices remain possible. Just as the post-war generation learned from the disasters of the 1930s to build something better, we can learn from our current predicament to construct new institutions and cultural norms appropriate for twenty-first-century challenges. This requires moving beyond the stale ideological battles that have dominated politics for decades and embracing the pragmatic spirit that focuses on what works rather than what sounds good. The practical agenda involves reforms across multiple domains: tax policies that capture economic rents for public purposes, investment strategies that rebuild opportunities in left-behind places, family policies that strengthen communities under stress, and cultural changes that restore the sense of shared identity and mutual obligation on which democratic societies depend. None of these changes will be easy, and all will require sustained political commitment over many years. But the alternative—continued division and social breakdown—is far worse. The choice facing democratic societies is whether they can rediscover the ethical foundations that once made capitalism serve the common good, or whether they will allow current trends to continue until the system breaks down entirely.
Related Books
Download PDF & EPUB
To save this Black List summary for later, download the free PDF and EPUB. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
By Paul Collier
