Mortality
Christopher Hitchens’ essays on dying
Book Edition Details
Summary
In the twilight between vigor and vulnerability, Christopher Hitchens masterfully navigates the treacherous landscape of terminal illness in "Mortality." Here lies a collection of essays penned with unyielding clarity and wit, as Hitchens confronts his own esophageal cancer diagnosis. Stripped of the comfort of faith, he wrestles with mortality's harsh realities, examining the profound impact of disease on our existence and perceptions. His narrative, both intensely personal and intellectually provocative, invites readers into a realm where humor and insight illuminate the darkest corners of human experience. Through his fearless exploration of life’s final chapter, Hitchens leaves an indelible mark on the literature of life, death, and the unvarnished truth that binds them.
Introduction
In June 2010, Christopher Hitchens woke up feeling "as if I were actually shackled to my own corpse." The celebrated writer and intellectual, known for his razor-sharp wit and fearless contrarian spirit, found himself transported overnight from "the country of the well" to what he would call "the land of malady." At sixty-one, the British-American author who had spent decades wielding his voice and pen against religious dogma, political hypocrisy, and intellectual laziness, now faced his greatest adversary: Stage Four esophageal cancer. Hitchens approached his diagnosis with the same unflinching honesty and intellectual rigor that had defined his career as one of the most provocative public intellectuals of his generation. Rather than retreating into privacy or self-pity, he chose to document his journey through what he termed "living dyingly," offering readers an unprecedented glimpse into the mind of a brilliant thinker grappling with mortality. Through his experience, we witness how a lifelong materialist confronts the ultimate test of his philosophical convictions, how a master of language faces the potential loss of his voice, and how someone who built his identity on fearless debate navigates the most personal battle of all.
The Diagnosis: From the Country of the Well
The morning that changed everything arrived without fanfare. Hitchens had been on a successful book tour, launching his memoir to sold-out audiences, when his body delivered its devastating verdict. The symptoms that had seemed merely troublesome—fatigue, a persistent cough—revealed themselves as harbingers of something far more sinister. Within hours of summoning emergency services from his New York hotel room, physicians confirmed what the shadow on his scans suggested: cancer had colonized his esophagus and spread to his lymph nodes. The irony was not lost on Hitchens that this disease had chosen the very organ that enabled his livelihood. His father had died of the same cancer at seventy-nine, making Christopher's diagnosis at sixty-one a brutal reminder of genetics and mortality. The tumor's location felt almost personal—attacking the pathway through which both nourishment and voice traveled. Yet even as he processed this life-altering news, Hitchens maintained his commitments, appearing on The Daily Show and at the 92nd Street Y, concealing his condition while vomiting between performances. What struck him most profoundly was the sudden transition from one world to another. The "country of the well" operated by different rules than this new territory he found himself inhabiting. In this medical landscape, everyone smiled encouragingly, and an egalitarian spirit prevailed among patients facing similar fates. However, the humor was weak, conversation avoided certain topics entirely, and the cuisine was, as he noted with characteristic wit, "the worst of any destination I have ever visited." The diagnosis forced an immediate reckoning with time itself. Plans for the next decade, dreams of seeing his children married, hopes of witnessing the rebuilding of the World Trade Center—all suddenly thrown into question. Yet Hitchens refused to indulge in the self-pity that such realizations might justify. Instead, he approached his new reality with the same intellectual curiosity that had driven his career, determined to experience even this final chapter fully conscious and alert.
Fighting Cancer While Defending Reason and Discourse
As news of his diagnosis spread, Hitchens found himself at the center of an unexpected phenomenon: a global prayer campaign. Religious communities across denominations—Catholic, Protestant, Jewish—dedicated special services to his recovery, despite his decades-long reputation as one of atheism's most eloquent advocates. The irony was rich enough to capture his analytical attention. Here was a man who had written "God Is Not Great" now being lifted up in countless supplications to the very deity whose existence he had spent his career disputing. The responses revealed fascinating theological contradictions. Some prayed for his physical healing while hoping primarily for his spiritual salvation. Others frankly admitted that his soul's condition concerned them more than his cancer's progression. Meanwhile, a darker faction openly celebrated his illness as divine retribution for his blasphemy, suggesting that God had specifically chosen throat cancer to silence his voice of dissent. Hitchens found these reactions intellectually stimulating rather than offensive, noting the logical inconsistencies in each position. He approached the prayer question with characteristic rigor, asking his religious correspondents a simple question: "Praying for what?" Their honest answers revealed the complexity of intercession itself. If God's plan was perfect and unchangeable, what purpose did prayer serve except to demonstrate human arrogance in presuming to advise the divine? If the faithful truly believed in an omniscient, omnipotent deity, then petitioning for alterations to cosmic will seemed theologically problematic at best. The medical establishment offered more tangible hope. Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health and a believing Christian, became both a source of cutting-edge treatment options and a fascinating study in the compatibility of scientific rigor and religious faith. Through Collins, Hitchens glimpsed the future of personalized medicine—genetic sequencing, targeted therapies, immunological interventions that might have seemed like science fiction just decades earlier. Yet each promising avenue seemed to close as quickly as it opened, his tumor proving resistant to the most advanced protocols available.
The Loss of Voice and Literary Identity
The cruelest blow came not as sudden agony but as gradual diminishment. Hitchens' voice—the instrument through which he had charmed dinner parties, commanded debate halls, and stoppped New York taxis at thirty paces—began to falter. What started as hoarseness progressed to an unreliable squeak, then to moments of complete silence. For a man whose identity was so thoroughly bound up in verbal expression, this loss felt like "an attack of impotence, or the amputation of part of the personality." The practical implications were immediately apparent. Conversations required strategic planning rather than spontaneous engagement. The exquisite timing that had made him a master of wit and repartee disappeared, replaced by the awful fact that people now listened "sympathetically" rather than eagerly. Even brief exchanges exhausted him, and he could no longer sustain the kind of marathon discussions that had been among his greatest pleasures. This physical deterioration forced him to confront the intimate connection between his spoken voice and his written one. Years earlier, a Guardian editor had advised him to write "more like the way you talk," advice that had revolutionized his prose style. He had always told his writing students that "anybody who could talk could also write," emphasizing the fundamental relationship between authentic speech and compelling prose. Now, facing the potential loss of that conversational voice, he wondered whether his writing could survive the amputation. The philosophical implications ran even deeper. Human speech, Hitchens reflected, distinguished our species not merely as communicating animals but as creatures capable of deploying vocal communication "for sheer pleasure and recreation." We alone could combine vocalization with reason and humor to produce what he called "higher syntheses." Literature itself had emerged from this marriage of voice and meaning—from the symposiums where philosophy evolved through spoken dialogue to the oral traditions that preceded written poetry. Yet even as his physical voice weakened, Hitchens discovered unexpected reserves of literary power. His writing about the cancer experience achieved new depths of honesty and insight. Stripped of the possibility of verbal performance, his prose became more essential, more direct. The prospect of silence paradoxically seemed to intensify his need to commit thoughts to paper, as if the written word might preserve what the failing voice could no longer sustain.
Final Reflections: Living Dyingly with Courage
In his final months, Hitchens grappled with the gap between philosophical preparation for death and its physical reality. He had long admired the Stoic tradition and prided himself on his materialist understanding of mortality. "I don't have a body, I am a body," he had written, yet found himself acting as though exceptions might be made for someone of his intellectual stature. The cancer forced an honest reckoning with this contradiction between theory and practice. The daily experience of severe illness proved far removed from abstract philosophical frameworks. The famous "stages of grief" model held little relevance to his situation. Rather than progressing through denial, anger, bargaining, and acceptance, he found himself oscillating between fierce engagement with life and pragmatic preparation for death. Some days brought the energy to debate theology with visitors; others reduced him to measuring time between pain medications. Hospital routines became strange parodies of normal existence. He transformed sterile medical environments into intellectual salons, engaging doctors and visitors in Socratic dialogues while intravenous drips delivered their chemical cocktails. Even intubated after a bronchoscopy, he scribbled notes and questions, his curiosity undimmed by physical distress. "I'm staying here until I'm cured," he wrote on a clipboard, "and then I'm taking our families on a vacation to Bermuda." The relationship between weakness and strength revealed unexpected complexities. Nietzsche's famous maxim—"whatever doesn't kill me makes me stronger"—proved inadequate to the reality of progressive illness. Cancer's assaults left him demonstrably weaker with each round, contradicting any notion that survival automatically conferred additional resilience. Yet within this physical deterioration, he discovered forms of moral and intellectual strength he hadn't previously accessed. His final fragmentary notes capture a mind still fully engaged despite bodily collapse. "I'm not fighting or battling cancer—it's fighting me," he observed, rejecting the militaristic metaphors others imposed on his situation. The honesty was characteristic: even facing death, he refused comforting illusions or false heroics. Instead, he offered something rarer and more valuable—an unflinching examination of mortality from inside the experience itself, conducted with the same intellectual rigor that had defined his career.
Summary
Christopher Hitchens' confrontation with terminal cancer revealed the ultimate test of a life dedicated to fearless inquiry and honest expression. Rather than retreating from his principles when faced with mortality, he applied the same intellectual courage to dying that he had brought to living, refusing both false comfort and self-pity while documenting the experience with unprecedented candor. His journey demonstrates that authentic courage lies not in denying life's fragility but in engaging fully with existence even as it diminishes, finding meaning through sustained curiosity and connection rather than through illusions of permanence. From his example, we might learn to approach our own inevitable mortality with similar honesty and grace, recognizing that the quality of our engagement with life matters more than its duration, and that the pursuit of truth and beauty remains worthwhile even when—perhaps especially when—time grows short.
Related Books
Download PDF & EPUB
To save this Black List summary for later, download the free PDF and EPUB. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
By Christopher Hitchens
