Rogues
True Stories of Grifters, Killers, Rebels and Crooks
Book Edition Details
Summary
In "Rogues," the masterful Patrick Radden Keefe invites readers into the shadowy alleys of human behavior where deception dances with truth. Known for his riveting narrative prowess, Keefe compiles twelve spellbinding tales from the annals of The New Yorker, each one a deep dive into the minds of society's most audacious outliers. Whether unraveling the audacious schemes of a vintage wine forger or contemplating the moral quagmire faced by a whistleblower at a Swiss bank, Keefe's journalistic finesse shines. He crafts vivid portraits of infamous figures while probing the fragile boundary between right and wrong. "Rogues" is more than a collection of stories; it's a thrilling exploration of the human penchant for mischief and the relentless pursuit of justice.
Introduction
Have you ever wondered how the most sophisticated frauds unfold right under the noses of experts who should know better? In auction houses where million-dollar artifacts change hands, in family kitchens where deadly secrets simmer for decades, in courtrooms where justice battles carefully orchestrated lies, ordinary people make extraordinary choices that reveal the darkest corners of human nature. These are not fictional villains from crime novels, but real individuals whose stories illuminate the razor-thin line between respectability and criminality, between loyalty and betrayal. Through meticulously researched true stories, this collection exposes how deception operates at every level of society, from the most rarified circles of wealth and expertise to the most intimate bonds of family. You'll discover how sophisticated fraudsters exploit our deepest assumptions about trust and authenticity, turning our faith in credentials and authority against us with devastating precision. You'll witness the corrosive power of family secrets and understand how even the most sacred relationships can become theaters of manipulation and violence. Most importantly, you'll learn to recognize the warning signs that distinguish genuine expertise from elaborate performance, helping you navigate a world where appearances can be not just deceiving, but fatally so.
The Jefferson Bottles: How Experts Become Accomplices to Fraud
In December 1985, Christie's auction house in London buzzed with anticipation as collectors gathered for what would become the most expensive wine sale in history. The star lot was a dark green bottle, its surface etched with "1787," "Lafitte," and the tantalizing initials "Th.J." The wine had allegedly been discovered behind a bricked-up cellar wall in Paris, and experts believed it had once belonged to Thomas Jefferson himself. When the gavel fell, collector Christopher Forbes had paid $157,000 for what he called a piece of liquid history. The bottle's provenance seemed impeccable. Michael Broadbent, Christie's wine expert and a master of wine, had authenticated it after consulting with glass specialists who confirmed the eighteenth-century French style. The seller, a charismatic German collector named Hardy Rodenstock, had become legendary in wine circles for his uncanny ability to discover the rarest vintages. He hosted lavish tastings where he served wines that predated the phylloxera epidemic, bottles so rare that most experts had never encountered them. When Rodenstock opened a 1921 Pétrus magnum at one event, the renowned critic Robert Parker awarded it a perfect hundred points, calling it "out of this universe." But billionaire collector Bill Koch grew suspicious when Monticello's researchers found no historical evidence that Jefferson had ever owned such bottles. Koch launched his own investigation, hiring former FBI agents and wine experts to trace the bottles' origins. What they discovered was breathtaking in its audacity. The engravings on the bottles showed tool marks consistent with modern electric devices, not eighteenth-century copper wheels. Scientific tests revealed that while the wine itself was genuinely old, the famous initials had been added recently. Rodenstock, it appeared, had been taking authentic antique bottles and transforming them into priceless Jefferson artifacts with nothing more than a dentist's drill. The Jefferson bottles scandal reveals how even the most sophisticated markets can be manipulated when expertise becomes performance. Rodenstock understood that in the rarified world of fine wine, provenance matters more than taste. He exploited collectors' desire to own pieces of history, knowing that few would ever open bottles worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. Most crucially, he recognized that once an expert like Broadbent had authenticated his work, other experts would be reluctant to contradict that judgment, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of credibility. When evaluating any high-stakes claim, always demand multiple independent sources of verification and be especially wary when questioning an expert's judgment seems to challenge an entire system of authority.
Family Loyalty as Prison: Breaking the Code of Silence
In the narrow canals of Amsterdam, Astrid Holleeder lived like a ghost in her own city. She moved between safe houses, wore bulletproof vests, and kept a collection of fake noses and teeth for disguises. Her elaborate security measures weren't protection from strangers, but from her own brother, Willem "Wim" Holleeder, the Netherlands' most notorious criminal. For decades, Astrid had been both his sister and his lawyer, helping to protect the family's darkest secrets. Now she was preparing to destroy him. The Holleeder family's criminal empire began with one of Europe's most audacious kidnappings. In 1983, Wim and his friend Cor van Hout abducted Freddy Heineken, the beer magnate, holding him for three weeks in a soundproofed warehouse. When they were finally captured and imprisoned, roughly eight million dollars of the ransom money was never recovered. While serving their sentences, they invested this fortune in Amsterdam's drug trade and red-light district, emerging from prison as wealthy men. But success bred paranoia, and Wim began systematically eliminating anyone who might threaten his empire, including his former partner Cor. Astrid knew her brother was a killer, but family loyalty kept her silent for years. She created legal dossiers for each murder case, helping Wim avoid prosecution while telling herself she was protecting her family. The breaking point came when she realized that Wim had orchestrated Cor's murder, betraying the man who had been like a brother to her and leaving Cor's children fatherless. In 2013, she made an extraordinary decision: she would secretly record her conversations with Wim, gathering evidence that could finally bring him to justice. For months, Astrid wore hidden microphones sewn into her clothing, capturing Wim's brutal threats and casual admissions of murder. The recordings revealed a man consumed by paranoia and greed, someone who threatened to kill his own sisters if they crossed him. When Astrid finally went public with her evidence, she didn't just expose her brother's crimes, she shattered the myth of the "huggable criminal" that Dutch media had created around him. The Holleeder case demonstrates how family loyalty can become a prison, trapping victims in cycles of abuse and complicity. When someone uses family bonds to justify harmful behavior, they're not preserving relationships, they're weaponizing them. True loyalty sometimes requires the courage to say no, even when the cost is everything you've ever known.
Twenty-Five Years of Justice: The Relentless Pursuit of Truth
Ken Dornstein was a college sophomore eating breakfast when he read about Pan Am Flight 103 exploding over Lockerbie, Scotland. He absorbed the tragedy with the detached sympathy reserved for strangers' misfortunes, never imagining his older brother David was among the 259 victims. David had changed his plans to surprise his family for Christmas, a decision that would reshape Ken's entire life. While other families grieved and moved on, Ken became obsessed with a single question: who built the bomb that killed his brother? For twenty-five years, Ken pursued this question with the methodical intensity of a detective. He learned Arabic, studied Middle Eastern politics, and traveled to war zones most journalists avoided. When revolution erupted in Libya in 2011, he saw his chance. While Tripoli burned around him, Ken hunted through abandoned intelligence bunkers and bombed-out villas, searching for the men on his list of suspected conspirators. One by one, he found them dead, killed by rebels or executed by their former colleagues. But one name kept appearing in classified documents: Abu Agila Mas'ud, a shadowy bomb-maker who seemed to exist only as a passport number. Ken's breakthrough came through painstaking detective work that spanned continents and decades. In East German Stasi files, he discovered that Mas'ud had been present at another terrorist attack, the 1986 bombing of a Berlin disco. A former Libyan operative confirmed that Mas'ud was the technical expert who built bombs for Qaddafi's regime. Most remarkably, Ken found recent footage showing Mas'ud greeting the convicted Lockerbie bomber upon his controversial release from Scottish prison, proof that the bomb-maker was still alive and still connected to the conspiracy. When Ken finally located Mas'ud in a Libyan courtroom, on trial for more recent bombings, he faced a profound choice. He could risk his life trying to confront the man in war-torn Libya, or he could return to his family in Massachusetts, knowing he had solved a case that had stumped international investigators for decades. He chose his family, understanding that his real victory was not revenge but revelation. Ken's quest illustrates how the search for truth can become both a calling and a trap, but his ultimate decision to prioritize his living family over his obsession with the past demonstrates wisdom that many avengers never achieve. Sometimes the most important victory is knowing when to stop fighting and start living.
The Loaded Gun: When Warning Signs Hide in Plain Sight
Amy Bishop sat silently through most of the faculty meeting, her colleagues discussing plans for the next semester that she wouldn't be part of. Her bid for tenure had been denied, her appeals exhausted, and her academic career was effectively over. Inside her handbag was a 9mm Ruger semiautomatic pistol. When the meeting concluded, she stood up, pulled out the gun, and methodically shot six of her colleagues, killing three. The entire rampage lasted less than a minute, but its roots stretched back nearly twenty-four years to another shooting in a kitchen in Massachusetts. In December 1986, twenty-one-year-old Amy had been alone in her family's house when she loaded her father's shotgun, claiming she was worried about burglars. When her eighteen-year-old brother Seth came home, she asked him to help her unload the weapon. According to Amy and her mother Judy, who claimed to witness the shooting, the gun accidentally discharged, killing Seth instantly. But police reports revealed disturbing details: after shooting her brother, Amy had fled the house with the loaded shotgun, demanded car keys from mechanics at a nearby auto shop, and was arrested only when officers surrounded her with weapons drawn. The investigation was compromised from the beginning. Judy Bishop, a politically connected town meeting member, demanded to see Police Chief John Polio, addressing him by his first name. Despite the evidence of Amy's threatening behavior after the shooting, Polio ordered her release without charges. The case was quickly classified as an accidental death, and Amy received no psychiatric evaluation or counseling. She returned to college, married, had children, and pursued an academic career, but the violence followed her. She was arrested for punching a customer at IHOP, questioned about pipe bombs sent to a Harvard professor, and repeatedly displayed erratic behavior that colleagues found disturbing. The pattern that emerged over decades shows how early warning signs can be ignored or explained away, especially when they involve someone from a respectable family. Amy's case reveals the dangerous intersection of untreated trauma, academic pressure, and easy access to firearms. Her mother's intervention after Seth's death, whether motivated by love or denial, prevented Amy from receiving the help she desperately needed. When someone in your life shows signs of escalating anger, paranoia, or threats of violence, don't assume they're just "blowing off steam" or that their respectable background makes them harmless. Take threats seriously, even from people you know well, and don't let social status or family connections prevent appropriate intervention.
Summary
The most dangerous deceptions are those that exploit our deepest assumptions about trust, expertise, and family loyalty, revealing that respectability is often the perfect camouflage for criminality. Always verify claims independently, especially when significant money, reputation, or safety is at stake, and be particularly suspicious when questioning an expert's judgment seems to challenge an entire system of authority. Pay attention to patterns of behavior over time rather than isolated incidents, and don't let someone's social status, family connections, or professional credentials blind you to clear warning signs. Most importantly, recognize that sometimes the most moral choice is the decision to break faith with those closest to us, whether that means exposing a family member's crimes, challenging a respected expert's conclusions, or refusing to enable someone's destructive behavior regardless of your personal relationship with them. The courage to see clearly and act decisively, even when it costs us everything we thought we valued, is often the only thing standing between civilization and chaos.
Related Books
Download PDF & EPUB
To save this Black List summary for later, download the free PDF and EPUB. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
By Patrick Radden Keefe
