The Haves and the Have-Nots
A Brief and Idiosyncratic History of Global Inequality
Book Edition Details
Summary
In the kaleidoscope of human history, wealth and poverty dance a complicated tango, and Branko Milanovic, a foremost thinker on economic disparity, invites you to witness this riveting performance. "The Haves and the Have-Nots" unlocks the secrets of financial inequity that have shaped civilizations and continue to define our world. Journey through time with Milanovic as your guide, exploring the wealth of Mr. Darcy, the stakes of Anna Karenina’s passion, and the fortunes of ancient Rome compared to today’s billionaires. With sharp wit and profound insights, he probes whether birthplace predestines wealth and contemplates the echoes of Marxism in our era. More than a historical account, this book is a bold call to recognize the fractures in our social fabric and ponder the consequences of ignoring them. Get ready to rethink everything you know about money and power in this compelling exploration of inequality’s past and present.
Introduction
Imagine standing in a Roman marketplace around the year 50 BCE, where the wealthiest senator could purchase the labor of perhaps 30,000 ordinary citizens with his annual income alone. Now picture yourself in modern-day Silicon Valley, where a tech billionaire's yearly earnings could theoretically employ 75,000 average American workers. The mathematics of inequality tell a fascinating story that spans millennia, revealing how the gap between rich and poor has evolved through empires, revolutions, and economic transformations. This exploration of global inequality unveils three profound historical questions that continue to shape our world today. First, how did ancient civilizations manage extreme wealth concentration without the modern tools of democracy or redistribution? Second, what unleashed the great economic divergence that separated nations into rich and poor during the Industrial Revolution? And third, why has globalization created both unprecedented prosperity and widening gaps between countries, even as it lifts millions from poverty? These questions matter deeply for anyone seeking to understand why our world looks the way it does today. Whether you're a student puzzled by persistent global poverty, a policy maker grappling with inequality's political consequences, or simply a curious reader wondering how we arrived at today's economic landscape, this historical journey provides essential context. The story of inequality is ultimately the story of human civilization itself, revealing the forces that have shaped societies from ancient Rome to modern China, and offering crucial insights into the choices that lie ahead.
Ancient Foundations: Inequality Within Civilizations and Empires
The roots of economic inequality stretch back to humanity's earliest civilizations, where wealth concentration reached levels that would astonish even today's observers. In the Roman Empire at its peak around 14 CE, Emperor Augustus commanded an annual income equivalent to that of 40,000 average citizens, while the empire's richest freedman, Marcus Antonius Pallas, accumulated wealth that would place him comfortably among today's global elite. These weren't anomalies but systematic features of preindustrial societies that had discovered the art of extracting maximum surplus from their populations. What made ancient inequality particularly striking was its curious mathematical structure. While the vast majority of people lived clustered around subsistence level, creating relatively flat inequality across most of the population, wealth at the very top soared to extraordinary heights. Roman senators averaged incomes five hundred times greater than ordinary citizens, yet this extreme concentration coexisted with relatively modest differences among the common people. It was as if society consisted of two separate worlds: the broad base of humanity surviving on roughly similar meager incomes, and a tiny elite inhabiting a realm of almost unimaginable luxury. The mechanism behind this pattern reveals a fundamental truth about preindustrial power structures. Ancient elites possessed what economists call "extraction efficiency," the ability to capture virtually every bit of surplus production beyond what was necessary for survival. In the Roman Empire, this extraction ratio reached nearly 100 percent of what was theoretically possible, meaning the elite appropriated almost everything above subsistence level. Similar patterns emerged across civilizations, from Moghul India to pre-Columbian America, suggesting that extreme inequality was not merely an accident of history but an inherent feature of societies organized around agricultural surplus and military control. This ancient template of inequality would prove remarkably persistent, surviving the fall of empires and the rise of new civilizations. The lessons embedded in these early patterns, particularly the relationship between political power and economic extraction, would echo through subsequent millennia. Understanding how ancient societies managed such extreme wealth concentration without triggering social collapse provides crucial insights into the political dynamics that would later shape the modern world's approach to inequality and redistribution.
The Industrial Revolution: When Nations Began to Diverge
The Industrial Revolution marked perhaps the most decisive turning point in the history of global inequality, transforming a world of relatively similar nations into one divided between rich and poor countries. Before 1800, even the wealthiest nations enjoyed living standards only two or three times higher than the poorest regions. The Netherlands, the world's richest country in 1820, had a per capita income just three times greater than China's. Within a century, this modest gap had exploded into a chasm that continues to define our world today. The transformation began in Britain around 1760, where a convergence of coal, capital, and innovation created the first industrial economy. Steam engines, textile mills, and railway networks didn't simply increase productivity; they unleashed what economists call the "Great Divergence," a process that sent some nations soaring toward unprecedented prosperity while leaving others trapped in agricultural stagnation. By 1870, the gap between the richest and poorest nations had widened to six-to-one, and it kept growing. This wasn't merely economic change but a fundamental reshaping of human possibilities on a global scale. What made this divergence so revolutionary was its self-reinforcing nature. Industrial nations developed not only superior technology but also the institutions and capital markets necessary to continuously innovate and expand. They built universities, patent systems, and financial networks that turned knowledge into competitive advantage. Meanwhile, regions that missed the initial wave found themselves increasingly unable to catch up, as the technological and capital requirements for industrialization grew ever more demanding. The Industrial Revolution thus created not just wealthy nations but wealthy nations with the capacity to stay ahead of their competitors indefinitely. The social consequences proved equally transformative. Within industrializing nations, the traditional pattern of elite extraction began to break down as new middle classes emerged and workers organized for better conditions. Paradoxically, even as gaps between nations widened dramatically, many industrial societies began experiencing internal equalization. The same forces that created global divergence also planted the seeds for domestic redistribution, setting up a tension between national equality and international inequality that would define the modern era. This dual legacy of the Industrial Revolution continues to shape global politics and economics today.
Modern Globalization: The Rise of Global Inequality (1950-Present)
The post-1950 era has witnessed globalization's paradoxical effects on inequality, creating simultaneously the greatest reduction in absolute poverty in human history and some of the most extreme wealth concentrations ever recorded. Today's global inequality reaches a Gini coefficient of 70, higher than any single nation and representing a level of disparity that would have been mathematically impossible in earlier eras. Yet this same period has seen over a billion people lifted from poverty, primarily through the remarkable economic transformations of China and India. The story of modern inequality revolves around three powerful and contradictory forces. First, rising inequality within most nations has pushed the global distribution toward greater disparity, as the top 1 percent of earners worldwide have captured an ever-larger share of total income. Second, continued divergence between rich and poor countries has maintained the colonial-era pattern where citizenship largely determines life prospects. A person born in a wealthy nation enjoys advantages that no amount of individual effort can overcome for someone born in a poor country, with location of birth explaining over 60 percent of lifetime income variation globally. Yet a third force has partially offset these disequalizing trends: the spectacular growth of Asia's giants. China's economy has expanded twelvefold since 1980, while India has achieved sustained growth rates that seemed impossible just decades ago. This Asian renaissance represents the most significant shift in global economic power since the Industrial Revolution, moving hundreds of millions of people from poverty toward middle-class living standards. In human terms, China alone has generated more welfare improvement over the past three decades than the United States achieved in its entire post-war boom. The tension between these forces has created today's complex inequality landscape, where global disparities remain extreme but are no longer uniformly increasing. Whether this represents a temporary pause or a fundamental turning point depends largely on whether Asian growth continues and spreads to other regions. The future of global inequality may well hinge on whether other developing nations can replicate the Asian model, and whether the developed world can address its own growing internal disparities. The choices made in the coming decades will determine whether globalization ultimately reduces or exacerbates the inequalities that have shaped human history for millennia.
Summary
The evolution of global inequality reveals a central paradox that has persisted across millennia: the simultaneous human capacity for creating both unprecedented prosperity and extreme disparities. From ancient Rome's extraction-efficient elites to today's globally connected billionaires, the mathematics of inequality have followed surprisingly consistent patterns, even as the underlying economic systems have transformed completely. The great lesson emerging from this historical sweep is that inequality is neither natural nor inevitable but rather the product of specific institutional arrangements, technological capabilities, and political choices that societies make about how to distribute the fruits of human productivity. Three crucial insights emerge from this historical journey that directly apply to contemporary challenges. First, extreme inequality tends to be politically unsustainable over the long term, requiring either institutional mechanisms for redistribution or ultimately facing social upheaval. Second, the forces driving inequality today, particularly the divergence between nations and concentration within them, are not immutable laws of economics but outcomes that can be influenced by policy choices and international cooperation. Third, periods of rapid technological change, like our current digital revolution, have historically created both opportunities for reducing inequality and risks of exacerbating it, depending on how societies choose to harness and distribute the benefits of innovation. Looking forward, the historical record suggests that addressing global inequality will require unprecedented international cooperation and institutional innovation. Just as the Industrial Revolution demanded new forms of social organization within nations, our interconnected global economy may require new mechanisms for ensuring that prosperity is shared across borders. The question is not whether such change is possible, but whether humanity will choose to learn from its long history of grappling with inequality or repeat the cycles of concentration and upheaval that have marked previous eras. The mathematics of inequality may be consistent across time, but the human choices that shape those mathematics remain entirely within our collective control.
Related Books
Download PDF & EPUB
To save this Black List summary for later, download the free PDF and EPUB. You can print it out, or read offline at your convenience.
By Branko Milanović
